January 1, 2018
How to make regular folks' $50 donations count in elections
As political campaigns heat up going into the March 20 primary election, it's a good time to think about drawing more voters into the process.
Too often, average voters think their voices are drowned out by waves of money. Too often, they're right.
An effective answer would be to set up a system that turbocharges small campaign donations by matching them with larger amounts of public funding, typically six dollars for every dollar an average citizen gives.
That would amplify the voices of ordinary voters, which so often are drowned out by increasingly large flows of cash from wealthy donors. Candidates who might not pay much attention to someone who forks over $100 would have more reason to do so if public matching boosted that donation to $700.
A system of matching small donations would encourage candidates to return to retail politics instead of spending so much of their time placing phone calls to people with hefty bank accounts. Candidates often complain they have to make those calls if they want to run viable campaigns. They also complain about donors who hand over $5,000 to an aldermanic candidate, for example, and then two months later call up and ask for a zoning change in the alderman's ward.
Small donor matching would give candidates an alternative. It also would encourage people who would like to run for office because they have ideas, but who don't have access to bottomless war chests. As the system encourages people to make donations, it also will encourage them to become more invested in the political process.
Some form of small donor matching exists in many large cities, and New York has had a successful system for decades.
The concept is popular with voters. In 2015, a Chicago advisory referendum asking if a city or state system should be set up to "reduce the influence of special interest money in elections by financing campaigns using small contributions from individuals and a limited amount of public money" got nearly 79 percent of the vote.
But legislation to enact such a system unfortunately has gone nowhere. In the City Council, where the average aldermanic race cost $225,000 in 2015, a proposed ordinance has disappeared into Rules Committee limbo. In the Legislature, a bill passed the Senate in the last session but died in a House committee. Legislation pushed by U.S. Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., to create a federal system has met a similar fate.
But Chicago Ald.
(49th) and state Rep.
, D-Chicago, said they plan to push for small donor matching again this year.
"It really just takes away that barrier that I think so many people perceive and experience, that it is too daunting to run, that it is all about the big donors," Cassidy said. "Really, the message we see at the state and federal level is that this is a game for the wealthy."
Once-successful public financing for presidential campaigns has been swamped by money that has poured in from super PACS raising unlimited funds since U.S. Supreme Court's 2010 Citizens United decision and associated rulings.
But there's still room for successful systems on the state and local levels. Proponents are calling for a six-to-one match on donations of up to $150 from donors who reside in the jurisdiction a candidate is campaigning to represent. Others could donate as well, but their contributions would not be matched.
In Chicago, candidates taking part in the system would agree not to accept donations over $500, and they would have to raise $17,500 in their ward from small donations before they could qualify for matching. A cap would limit how much each candidate could receive. The goal isn't to match the highest-spending candidates, but to give all serious candidates enough money to run a viable campaign.
Power brokers won't like it, and incumbents who know who to call for big checks won't necessarily be enthusiastic, either. Some taxpayers also might balk at the cost — an estimated $20 million per election cycle in the city.
But that's a small investment for a system that makes politicians more responsive to the people they represent.
The Quincy Herald-Whig
in 36 states, including Illinois, Missouri
FLU season swept into Illinois and Missouri just before the cold weather settled in the week before Christmas, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention now reports that 36 states have reported widespread flu outbreaks.
There were 7,249 positive lab tests for this flu season in Illinois, while Missouri reported 8,458 cases in the week that ended Dec. 23 -- or more than seven times as many as during the same week in 2016, according to the St. Louis Post-Dispatch.
Melanie Arnold of the Illinois Department of Public Health said the state only tracks flu cases that involve hospitalizations or deaths. It stands to reason that the number of people with the flu far exceeds what those lab tests would indicate because many people with symptoms don't go to hospitals or physicians to get tested.
In reaction, Blessing Hospital was among several health care facilities to put restrictions on visitors based on age or the presence of flu symptoms. Those visiting restrictions will remain in place this month.
Jennifer Radtke, infection prevention manager at the University of Tennessee Medical Center, told the Associated Press this flu season may be worse than usual because this year's vaccine offers limited protection from the strain that is most prevalent.
"It's anywhere from 10 to 33 percent effective, so any time there's a mismatch between the vaccine and the circulating strain of the flu, you're going to see more cases," Radtke said.
While no vaccine is fully effective, vaccines usually reduce risks of the flu by 40 to 60 percent. Even in years where the vaccine is less effective, vaccinations help by reducing the severity of illness in many cases.
Flu symptoms include fever, sore throat, nasal congestion or a runny nose, cough, muscle aches, headache, vomiting and diarrhea. Epidemiologists recommend that everyone wash their hands frequently, cover coughs and either stay home or seek treatment if symptoms develop.
Doctors have one other bit of wisdom to share: Flu season usually doesn't peak until February.
That super deal on Craigslist could cost you everything
A student in Georgia thought answering the Craigslist ad would get him a cheap iPhone 6 in 2015. Instead, it got him killed.
A "doctor" in Utah offered $200 for anatomy research subjects in his Craigslist ad. Two women answering the ad got raped.
An Alabama couple wanted to buy an SUV advertised for $8,000 below market on Craigslist. Instead they had their $22,000 in cash taken and were nearly killed.
Southern Illinois University Edwardsville
student Taylor Clark, 19, of St. Jacob, in 2015 tried to sell his 2007 Nissan 350 Z on Craigslist. Michael Gordon, 27, murdered Clark, dumped his body and stole the car.
Gordon was recently sentenced to life in prison without possibility of parole.
The world is a dangerous place. When you mix cash, valuable merchandise and strangers with an anonymous system you can regularly see tragedy.
Craigslist is the common denominator in these crimes, but common sense can keep you safe.
Don't invite strangers to your house. Meet buyers or sellers in a public place. Better yet, go to the Fairview Heights Police station or another police parking lot where they have lights and signs warning of video surveillance, specifically for Craigslist transactions. Take your cell phone. Tell a friend or family where you are going.
But most importantly, trust your instincts. If it doesn't feel right, bail.
There's no deal out there worth your life.
Copyright 2018 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.